The fact that species richness, on average, increases with the scale of observation (grain size) is a fundamental law of ecology and biogeography. Still there is much dispute about how different factors contribute to shaping such species-area relationships (SARs) and which mathematical models are best suited for their description. Scale dependency, however, means more than just SARs. While ecologists often assume “universality” of diversity gradients along, for example, latitudinal and longitudinal gradients, as well as uniform underlying drivers, there might actually be a change in biodiversity patterns as well as in the role of different environmental factors that shape them when looking at different spatial grains.
In my talk, I will briefly introduce the idea of scale dependency in ecology and its manifestation in SARs and other phenomena. For a better understanding studies that combine analyses at different spatial grain sizes are important, particularly if they cover larger spatial extents. One particularly prominent manifestation of the scale dependency is the fact that global maxima of vascular plant species richness for grain sizes from 100 m² upwards are (expectedly) found in Neotropical rainforests, while at smaller grain sizes (probably unexpected for many) European semi-dry basiphilous grasslands are the global record holders, far above rainforests or any other habitat type studied so far. Starting from this, I will explore scale dependency in patterns and causes of biodiversity, using examples mostly from European grasslands and from Southern African drylands.
The ecology and conservation of a seasonally dry tropical forest in South America
The tangled evolutionary history of plants and fungi
|Di. 22.05.2018 aktuell|